Thursday, October 12, 2017

On Miles Mathis on "The Las Vegas Hoax" and "the controlled opposition"


Jim Fetzer


Miles Matthis is an interesting guy, who is quite intelligent and original in thought. His latest, "Las Vegas Hoax" (10 October 2017), offers quite a few important observations that contribute to understanding what really happened in (what has to be) the most complicated and confusing "false flag" of them all--with the exception of 9/11. See, for example, "9/11: Who was responsible and why".

His analysis of the Las Vegas event

His critique of the photograph with which he begins his blog are rather brilliant and devastating to the "official narrative", which has been falling apart since the event itself took place. He advances point after point why this appears to be a staged (or even photoshopped) image and why even the lighting does not make sense, if this had been a real event. Here are the observations he provides about it:
First of all, what's wrong with the photo above? You have to look closely at these pictures and think them through. Almost nobody does that. It is a paste-up. How do I know? Because it makes no sense. Look at the two people climbing over the fence. That is the major clue. Isn't it odd to find them both in the same position, within a few feet of one another? Let me ask you this: would you climb a low fence in that way? I wouldn't. If someone was shooting at me, I would vault that sucker. But here we have a guy and a gal, both apparently young, both bellying over as if they are on a drunken treasure hunt. They look chosen and placed to me. The photo looks composed.
What else? Well, these two are scrambling over the fence, but on the other side people are just lying and sitting around. They don't seem to be still worried by an active shooter, do they? So they don't match the climbers in attitude. They are acting like that fence is a perfect barrier, but it is just made of mesh. Plus, it is only about four or five feet high. The shots are allegedly coming from 32 stories up, so it would be no protection at all. What else? Note the lighting, which makes no sense. We are supposed to be at 10pm here, and I assume these people have just climbed a fence on the outer edge of the concert grounds. So why are they lit like it is during the day, at about 5pm? The faces are in half-light, like in the evening. Stage lights or floods wouldn't light them like that.
He also has astute observations about the background of Stephen Paddock, the patsy, and some of the motives that appear to have driven the event, such as promoting gun control and installing body scanners, where the Chertoff Group stands to make billions, should this staged event lead to their adaption not only in Las Vegas but at institutions (such as schools and churches) across the nation:
Other researchers have shown that prior to the fake shooting spree, Crowds on Demand placed ads in Craigslist and other places looking to hire crisis actors by the thousands. We may assume they found them.
Speaking of the Department of Homeland Security, did you know that there were other smaller shooting events that night at other Las Vegas casinos? They have been overshadowed by the Mandalay Bay event, but shots (again probably blanks) were fired at many casinos. This according to people staying at those casinos. Did you know that DHS is pushing to install expensive body scanners at all Las Vegas casinos? Of course this hoax is the perfect pretext for that, isn't it? Do you know what company developed the body scanners currently in use? Lockheed Martin. Just a coincidence, right? The body scanner business is now owned by L-3 Technologies, which posted 10.5 billion in revenues in 2016 and expects even more profits in 2017-18.
It is now one of the top-10 government contractors. It was previously Loral Corporation, a subsidiary of Lockheed Martin run by Bernard Schwartz until 2006. Loral already had 5.5 billion revenue in 1995 by itself. Remember, they don't tell us what company “that later merged with Lockheed Martin” Stephen Paddock worked for. I suggest it was Loral. It looks like the Carlyle Group is also involved, since one of Loral's “other acquisitions” listed at Wikipedia is LTV missiles, now known as Vought Aircraft Industries. Carlyle owned Vought until 2010, when it sold to Triumph Group, formerly Alco Standard.
He cannot possibly have won millions playing video poker (which my wife can confirm) and he may have instead have been laundering vast sums of money for his benefactors, which may or may not include the CIA but almost certainly Sheldon Adelson, Steve Wynn and George Soros, who had a major short on MGM, whose own executives were selling off their stock in advance of this event.

His attack on "the controlled opposition"

In spite of the excellence of most of what he reports here, he felt obligated to attack several of us whom he regards as "controlled opposition", including, in this case, Kevin Barrett, Mike Adams and Robert David Steele, in addition to me. His reason for attacking me verges on the absurd: he thinks the death of JFK was staged (a fake event), while I take it seriously and regard it as real! He writes,
On the way out, I want to comment on a couple of “Truthers” at youtube spreading lies. The first is Kevin Barrett, using “ex-CIA” phony Robert Steele to promote the idea people were “shredded by hollow-point bullets in a massacre”. To start with, there is no such thing as ex-CIA. Once CIA, always CIA, so I don't know why anyone trusts these guys. If I were ex-CIA, would you trust me? No, so why trust this guy? Notice that in the first moments of the interview, Steele takes the existence of ISIS as a given. That is one of the desiderata of his analysis: that you believe ISIS exists. It doesn't. Or, it exists exactly like Osama bin Laden existed. There were and are real people getting their pictures taken and doing things. They aren't SIMs or CGI. But they aren't terrorists as you are told. Osama was a rich Saudi working for us mainly as an actor, and the ISIS goons are the same. They are a group of actors who look Middle-Eastern working for worldwide intelligence. They are our created enemies right now.
So, Barrett is compromised. I don't trust him and you shouldn't either. What about his ex-partner Jim Fetzer? Same deal. Fetzer and Barrett fall together. Notice that in Fetzer's hour-long video, his buddyDean Ryan compares Las Vegas to the Kennedy Assasination before the two-minute mark, selling them both as real. Ryan claims his ex-girlfriend's uncle was killed in the shooting. Sorry, Dean, I think we are going to need more than that. How about a name, so we can non-confirm it?
So I assume all these guys are planted agents. You now see why I have refused to be interviewed by either Fetzer or Barrett. Fetzer wanted to use my Charlottesville analysis for his new book and I told him no. He mentioned that he wanted to post a disclaimer on my Kennedy remarks in that paper, since of course he is still selling that event as real. I told him I didn't want to be a part of his book, with or without the disclaimer. I want to have nothing to do with these guys, since I can see they are controlling the opposition.
Having exposed that Osama bin Laden was working for the CIA and died on 15 December 2001 but was resurrected and killed again to position Barack Obama for a triumphal reelection; and that JFK was taken out, not by Lee Oswald, but by other shooters, where my collaborative research on JFK shattered the cover-up and exposed the role of LBJ and the CIA, I find his attitude incomprehensible. See, for example,



His attacks on Kevin Barrett and on Robert David Steele strike me as equally bizarre and ill-founded. Surely different students of Las Vegas can arrive at different (tentative and provisional) findings in a convoluted and rapidly-changing information environment without therefore having to be members of the controlled opposition. Mike Adams acoustic research, for example, is obviously completely sincere. 



There is something strange about his denial of the existence of ISIS, which we know was "Made in the USA" with the complicity of Israel and Saudi Arabia. That ISIS was not an indigenous uprising but was created to bring pressure on Bashar al-Assad to drive him from power as the penultimate stage in the master plan to take out the governments of seven nations in the next five years surely does not make it unreal.



But for Miles Matthis to attack other students of Las Vegas when their information is fragmented and incomplete and authorities are changing their story to cover enormous gaps that make no sense at all does not show those he attacks--even if they are mistaken in their fallible conclusions--have done anything wrong. He simply disgraces himself and raises serious questions about his own credibility.

Jim Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer, is McKnight Professor Emeritus on the Duluth Campus of the University of Minnesota and the co-editor of moonrockbooks.com.