Saturday, February 18, 2017

D.C. police arrest Trump inauguration domestic terrorists


Mere days before President Trump’s inauguration, using hidden cameras, James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas captured video and audio evidence of a radical Left group plotting to disrupt and cause mayhem at the inauguration.
Members of DisruptJ20 were captured on video in Pizzagate’s Comet Ping Pong pizzeria discussing how they would disrupt the pro-Trump Deploraball on the night of January 19 at the National Press Building, Washington, DC, by releasing butyric acid stink-bombs into the ventilation system and setting off fire alarm sprinklers.
Those plans are outright terrorism and in violation of D.C. Code 22-3571.01(6) that carries a 5-year prison sentence:
“It shall be unlawful for anyone to willfully or knowingly, with the intent of intimidating or frightening people, causing panic or civil unrest….”
One of the terrorists, Luke Kuhn of the D.C. Anti-Fascist Coalition, was heard on the video threatening the D.C. government and the police:
“The message has to be, we do not recognize the city government either. If you try to close us down we will look for your house, we will burn it. We will physically fight the police if they try to steal one of our places. We will go to war and you will lose.”
Well, it looks like the D.C. police took the threats seriously by arresting three of the DisruptJ20 terrorists: Scott Ryan Charney (aka Scott Green), Colin Dunn and Luke Kuhn.
Scott Ryan Charney was the first to be arrested.
As reported by Andrea Noble of the Washington TimesScott Charney was arrested on January 19, the night before the inauguration, for conspiracy to commit assault. Charney, 34, was one of the three men caught on Project Veritas’ camera.
Court documents indicate that police relied on the Project Veritas video, as well as emails sent between protest organizers, including emails sent by Charney to several individuals stating that he had conducted reconnaissance at the National Press Club, and believed his group “would be able to accomplish their objective ‘with no negative consequences for our side, nor any collateral damage.’”
Here’s the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department’s press release.
On February 15, Project Veritas tweeted that Luke Kuhn and Colin Dunn had also been arrested:
disruptj20-arrests1disruptj20-arrests2
Police should also look into Luke Kuhn’s pedophile activities, based on his writings that were unearthed by citizen journalists on Reddit.
inauguration-terrorists5
(1) On Sept. 22, 1997, Kuhn wrote in an essay titled “Ronald McDonald the child-molesting clown”:
“a burger loaded with E. Coli or Mad Cow disease will do a child far more damage than some seedy sexual encounter in the woods behind the school could ever dream of.”
(2) In an email on April 14, 1998, Kuhn wrote:
I have been a sexually-active bisexual since I was 12 years old…. Here in Montgomey County, MD, one of the things the Utopian Anarchist Party (a youth militia when you get right down to it) has been doing is running an underground railroad for runaways…. Keep up the good fight, for you are waging a holy war against the devils of psychiatry and minimum age laws…. I know one thing, if I had had parents who put me in a mental hospital for being Gay-or for being an anarchist, I would probably have burned them out for it.”
(3) On June 19, 1998, Kuhn wrote:
“I am writing in response to the lurid tales that have been circulating for the past week accusing the UAP [Utopian Anarchist Party] of running ‘child-pornography’ and other such commercial operations involving young people…. Yes, I did post a few articles to Boychat,which I found through a law-enforcement Web site. Why? What better place to post articles about the Mary Kay Latourneau case. Yes, I support the right of young people to CHOOSE to be sexually active if they so desire. As I stated in my original posts on the subject, I started having sex by my own choice when I was 12. My partner was 15 or 16. He asked first, but I kept going back for more-and never, ever regretted it.”
H/t PJMedia
~Eowyn

Appendix B: Hillary used Body Doubles during the Campaign--and even in the Debates


Jim Fetzer

Separating issues, I am publishing additional demonstrations of the power of new research techniques to establish new findings, even about the presidential campaign of 2016, which illustrates the application of the techniques used to establish that "Noah Pozner" was created as a fictitious character by using photos and films of Michael Vabner as a child in exposing the chicanery of Hillary Clinton. 

PROOF 6: HILLARY USED BODY DOUBLES DURING THE CAMPAIGN

A similar technique has been used to demonstrate that Hillary Clinton used body doubles during the campaign, one of whom was good enough to actually participate in debates with Bernie Sanders and with Donald Trump. The first of three doubles was sent out of Chelsea's apartment building, lest public anxiety about her health create an insuperable obstacle to the continuation of pursuit of our nation's highest office:



She was 2-3 inches shorter, 35-40 pounds lighter and looked at least ten years younger. She was limber and agile and--most unlike Hillary--pleasant. She was not surrounded by bodyguards, was missing her health handler and Chelsea did not come out to wish her well. She reminded me of the actress in "You've Got Mail!" that I refer to her as Hillary's "Meg Ryan" double. But just a few days later, another was impersonating her on the plane to Greensboro:


This "Hillary" was taller and thinner than Hillary, with a more sloping forehead, the wrong nose and missing the two moles that Hillary has above and below the right corner of her mouth. Because she reminds me of America's most celebrated actress, I refer to her as Hillary's "Meryl Streep" double. When we take a closer look by comparing this double with the woman she is impersonating, there really isn't any room for doubt about it:
Most audacious of all, Hillary used a third double, who was outed using a technique like that which has cemented "Noah" as Michael-Vebner-as-a-child. Consider the ratio of the distance between the pupils to the bottom of the upper teeth, which appears to be constant throughout one's life. Hillary had an eye-teeth ratio of 1/1.2, but her double--who was by far the best and even substituted for her during the debates--had an eye-teeth ratio of 1/1.06:


Here's the video study that established that Hillary has gotten away with a monstrous fraud upon the American people, which is only one more proof that she is completely and totally corrupt and would have made a terrible President of the United States. The one we elected has his obvious human failings, but only some combination of megalomania and narcissim could possibly justify a deception of the public of this enormous magnitude:




For extensive documentation of Hillary's use of body doubles, including a hundred photos comparing them--the first and the second, but not the third, which is a more recent discovery--check out From Orlando to Dallas and Beyond (2016). The extent and variety of "false flag" events during the Obama administration has been simply overwhelming:




Jim Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer, is McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth.

Appendix A: Oswald was in the doorway during the assassination of JFK


Jim Fetzer

Separating issues, I am publishing two additional demonstrations of the power of new research techniques to establish new findings, even about a case as old as the assassination of JFK. Larry Rivera, whose brilliant work has confirmed that "Noah Pozner" was created as a fictitious character by using photos and films of Michael Vabner as a child, has also exposed the darkest secret of the "Deep State".

PROOF 5: OSWALD WAS IN THE DOORWAY DURING THE SHOOTING

For those who would appreciate Larry's brilliance in nailing down the identity of "Doorman", check out the following presentation, where you will gain further understanding of the application of the principles of photogrammetry (by applying mathematical precision to the analysis of photographic images) has contributed to solving the greatest murder mystery in history--the assassination of JFK.

This is the portion of the Altgens6, as it is technically known, that shows the figures whose identities has been the subject of intense scrutiny. The figure in the middle, who appears to be missing his left shoulder, is known as "Doorman", while the figure to his left (to our right, holding his hands above his eyes to protect them from the sun) is known as "Black Hole Man". The challenge has been to establish their identities.


Ralph Cinque was the first to emphasize that the clothing they were wearing was the key to their identity, since Doorman is wearing clothing strikingly similar to that Lee Oswald was wearing when he was arrested. The Warren Commission, however, concluded that Doorman was instead Billy Lovelady, a coworker, who himself observed that he thought it was odd they should be confused, since he was 2-3 inches shorter and 15-20 pounds heavier. 

Here are two of the many gifs that Larry produced to prove that "Doorman" was Lee Oswald and a third showing that "Black Hole Man" was actually Billy Lovelady. So, while they were both in the doorway at the same time, the government traded upon ambiguity to claim that Doorman was Billy Lovelady. Larry's research has thereby conclusively settled one of the most enduring controversies in the history of JFK research:

Proof "Doorman" was Lee Harvey Oswald
Proof "Doorman" was not Billy Lovelady
Proof Billy Lovelady was "Black Hole Man"
That Lee was standing in the doorway of the Texas School Book Depository at the time the motorcade was passing by means not only that he cannot have been "the lone gunman", as the Warren Commission portrayed him, but that he cannot have even been one of the shooters. And this turns out to be the deepest secret about the death of JFK. A new book that I have edited on the assassination, JFK: Who, How and Why (2017), is about to appear:




Jim Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer, is McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth.


Friday, February 17, 2017

Sandy Hook Charade: "Noah Pozner" was Michael Vabner as a Child


Jim Fetzer

In "Is Noah's Older Step-Brother, Michael Vabner, Noah "all grown up?" (27 January 2016), Kelley Watt was the first to suggest that the person Lenny Pozner claims to have died at Sandy Hook on 14 December 2012, Noah, was actually his purported older step-brother, Michael Vabner, as a child. Here are some images that Kelley has offered in support:

Here's an interview with Kelley Watt in which we review the evidence, where her hypothesis at this point was a fascinating conjecture but where many to whom she had shown the photographs had no hesitation in affirming that, in their view, based on their experience, Michael is Noah "all grown up"!

According to Lenny Pozner, who purports to be his father, Noah was a first grade student at Sandy Hook Elementary School on 14 December 2012, when he and 19 other children were massacred by Adam Lanza. Here is a passport image declaring his date of birth to have been 20 November 2006:


If Noah was born on 20 November 2006, then he would have been six years old, which would be appropriate to have been a 1st grader at Sandy Hook Elementary School on 14 December 2012. We now have multiple proofs that falsify this scenario and confirm the hypothesis that Noah is Michael as a child.

PROOF 1: NOAH AND SPIDERMAN (Anonymous2

Here we have a frame from a video of Noah talking about a scene from "Spiderman" (2002). You can watch the video by clicking Noah and Spiderman. From the vivid details of his recollection, Anonymous2 infers that Noah had just seen the movie, which would make him around 4 years old in 2002:


At the time of the event at Sandy Hook on 14 December 2012, however, Noah was supposed to be 6 years old. He cannot have been 4 years old in 2002 and only 2 years older in 2012. He would have been around 14 at the time of the alleged shooting, which would better fit Michael Vabner, not Noah.


PROOF 2: IT'S NOAH BY AN EAR (Dr. Eowyn) 

We have more photographs of Noah and of Michael to work with today, including the following, which invite comparisons of their ears. As has become more widely known, ears are as distinctive as fingerprints. So having the same ears would be another strong proof that they are not two different people:





Dr. Eowyn cropped photos of the two and focused on their ears. Here is her side-by-side comparison below. At first, Noah's left ear appeared to have a smaller lobe than Michael's left ear. But a picture of Noah's right ear reveals a lobe like Michael's. Her conclusion: they have the same ears! 


If Noah and Michael have the same ears and ears are as distinctive as fingerprints, then we have a proof that Noah and Michael are one and the same that is as powerful as fingerprints, which of course are frequently introduced in courts of law. (See if you can tell which ears Dr. Eowyn selected for comparison. Try one of your own!)

PROOF 3: THEY HAVE THE SAME EYES (Dennis Cimino)

Dennis Cimino has done exquisite work on the alteration of the most famous photograph from the assassination of JFK--the Altgens6, as it is technically known--so I was confident that he could make valuable contributions to our analysis of the Noah/Michael mystery. He agrees with Eowyn about their ears and adds that their eyes also seem to be the same: 



In "Sandy Hook: More on Noah Pozner and Michael Vabner", Anonymous (as opposed to Anonymous2) observed that these photos looked photoshopped, which Dennis confirms with several abnormalities, including that the head is disproportionately large on the left:

Not only was this setting not a modern library, as Anonymous observed, but the neck discoloration top/mid neck to bottom neck and chest and the odd brown thing on the right (our left) side of his neck indicate that this one, like the others, has been photoshopped:


Moreover, as Dennis has remarked, why would there be any reason to alter them unless something important was at stake, such as creating a false photographic trail to convey the false impression that "Noah" was years younger than his actual age as Michael? 

PROOF 4: THEY ARE THE SAME PERSON (Larry Rivera)

Larry Rivera has done brilliant research proving that the figure known as "Doorman" standing in the doorway of the Texas School Book Depository was in fact Lee Oswald, as Harold Weisberg, Jim Garrison and other serious students of JFK have believed. So I was sure he could help to resolve this issue by superposition:



Larry found that these were the photos that best facilitated the superposition, where the eyes, the eyebrows and the mouth align almost perfectly. The key is fixing the inter-pupillary distance (between the pupils of their eyes) the same. I knew he could help to resolve this issue by superposition. Here is a series that demonstrates that, in spite of their age difference, considering normal growth, Noah and Michael are one and the same:






This has to be one of the most powerful proofs yet that Sandy Hook was a hoax. Lenny had already been outed by having sent Kelley Watt a "death certificate" for Noah Pozner that turned out to be a fabrication. If Noah had died at Sandy Hook, Lenny would not have had to fake it. This is another example of the power of collaborative research using the internet--and further proof that Sandy Hook was an elaborate charade.

CONCLUDING REFLECTIONS

For additional substantiation, check out Nobody Died at Sandy Hook (2015). The power of the internet as an instrument for research has proven itself, where the work of Anonymous, Anonymous2, Dr. Eowyn, Dennis Cimino and Larry Rivera has demonstrated that Kelley Watt had it right: "Noah Pozner" is a fiction made from real and altered photos of his purported older half-brother, Michael Vebner, as a child. 

Acts of terrorism are designed to instill fear into a population to make its members more amenable to manipulation to promote a political agenda. The Sandy Hook hoax involved the highest echelons of the US government, which must be held responsible for the evil it has perpetrated and the pain and suffering that the public has had to endure. This was an act of terrorism by the American government upon the American people. 

Jim Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer, is McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth.

Thursday, February 16, 2017

Paul Craig Roberts: The Trump Presidency: RIP!


Has Donald Trump overestimated his presidential power? The answer is yes.
Is Steve Bannon, Trump’s main advisor, politically inexperienced? The answer is yes.
We can conclude from the answers to these two questions that Trump is in over his head and will pay a big price.
How large will the price be?
The New York Times reports that US “intelligence agencies…sought to learn whether the Trump campaign was colluding with the Russians on the hacking or other efforts to influence the election.”
Former National Security Agency (NSA) spy John Schindler tweeted on Twitter that a senior intelligence community colleague sent him an email stating that the deep state had declared nuclear war on Trump and that “He will die in jail.” It is possible that this will be the case.
At the end of World War II, the military/security complex decided that the flow of profits and power from war and threats of war were too great to be relinquished to an era of peace. This complex manipulated a weak and inexperienced President Truman into a gratuitous Cold War with the Soviet Union. The lie was created, and accepted by the gullible American people, that International Communism intended world conquest. This lie was transparent, because Stalin had purged and murdered Leon Trotsky and all communists who believed in world revolution. “Socialism in one country,” declared Stalin.
Academic experts, knowing where their bread was buttered, went along with and contributed to the deceit. By 1961 the overarching power of the military/security complex was apparent to President Eisenhower, a five star general in charge of the US invasion of German occupied Western Europe during the Second World War. The private power that the military/security complex (Eisenhower called it the military-industrial complex) exercised disturbed Ike so much that in his last address to the American people he said we must guard against its subversion of democracy:
“Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations.
“This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence — economic, political, even spiritual — is felt in every city, every State house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.
“In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.
“We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.”
Eisenhower’s warning was to the point. However, it relied on “an alert and knowledgeable citizenry,” which the US does not have. The American population is largely insoucient, and is heading, across the ideological spectrum from left to right, to self-destruction.
The print and TV media, which serve as propagandists for the ruling military/security complex and Wall Street elites, make certain that Americans have nothing but bogus orchestrated information. Every household and person who turns on TV or reads a newspaper is programed to live in a false orchestrated reality that serves the tiny few who comprise the ruling Establishment.
Trump challenged this Establishment without realizing that it is more powerful than a mere President of the United States.
This is what has happened: During Obama’s second term, Russia and its president were demonized by the military/security complex and the neoconservatives using the presstitute media. The demonization has facilitated the ability of the controlled presstitute media, such as the New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, MSNBC, and the rest, to associate contact with Russia and articles questioning the orchestrated tensions between the US and Russia with suspicious activity, possibly even treason. Trump and his advisors were too inexperienced to realize that the consequence of Flynn’s dismissal was to validate this orchestrated association of the Trump presidency with Russian intelligence.
Now we have the media whores and the political whores asking the question used to blacken President Nixon and to force his resignation: “What did the President know and when did he know it?” Did Trump know that Gen. Flynn spoke to the Russian ambassador weeks before Trump said he did? Did Flynn do the unspeakable—speak to a Russian—because Trump told him to do so?
The purveyors of fake news—the New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, MSNBC, and the rest of the despicable liars are using irresponsible innuendo to entangle President Trump in a web of treason. Here is the New York Times headline: “Trump Campaign Aides Had Repeated Contacts With Russian Intelligence.” What we are witnessing is a campaign by the deep state using their media whores to set up Trump for impeachment.
Those at work overturning the 2016 presidential election are so confident of their success that they publicly declare their preference for coup over democracy. The zionist neoconservative warmonger Bill Kristol has expressed his preference for a deep state coup over democratically elected President Trump.
The liberal/progressive/left has aligned with the One Percent against the “racist, misogynist, homophobic” working class—the “Trump deplorables”—who elected Trump. Even the uninformed musician, Moby, felt compelled to post ignorant nonsense on Facebook:
“1-the russian dossier on trump is real. 100% real. he’s being blackmailed by the russian government, not just for being peed on by russian hookers, but for much more nefarious things.
2-the trump administration is in collusion with the russian government, and has been since day one.”
Now that Trump has been tainted with “associations with Russian intelligence,” the idiot Republicans, according to Bloomberg, have “joined calls by Democrats for a deeper look at contacts between President Donald Trump’s team and Russian intelligence agents Wednesday [Feb. 15], indicating a growing sense of political peril within the party as new reports surfaced of extensive contacts between the two.
Of course, there is no evidence of such contacts, but facts are not part of the campaign to depose Trump.
Trump’s sacking of Flynn is being used as vindication by his opponents of their false charges that the President of the United States is compromised by Russian intelligence. Realizing the mistake, the White House has tried to counter its blunder by saying that Flynn was dismissed because Trump lost confidence in him, not because he did anything illegal or had connections to Russian intelligence. But none of Trump’s opponents are listening. And the CIA keeps feeding fake news to the presstitutes.
From the very beginning I warned that Trump lacked the experience and the knowledge to pick a government that would stand by him and serve his agenda. Trump has now fired the one person on whom he could have counted. The most obvious conclusion is that Trump is dead meat.
The effort of the American people to bring government back under their control via Trump has been defeated by the deep state.
Chris Hedges argument that revolution is the only way that Americans can reclaim their country continues to gain credibility.
The words that doomed Trump when he declared war before he had his army assembled:
“There is nothing the political establishment will not do, and no lie they will not tell, to hold on to their prestige and power at your expense. The Washington establishment, and the financial and media corporations that fund it, exists for only one reason: to protect and enrich itself. This is a crossroads in the history of our civilization that will determine whether or not We The People reclaim control over our government. The political establishment that is trying everything to stop us, is the same group responsible for our disastrous trade deals, massive illegal immigration, and economic and foreign policies that have bled this country dry.“ 
“The political establishment has brought about the destruction of our factories and our jobs, as they flee to Mexico, China and other countries throughout the world. It’s a global power structure that is responsible for the economic decisions that have robbed our working class, stripped our country of its wealth, and put that money into the pockets of a handful of large corporations and political entities.”

Open Warfare Declared in DC as Deep State ‘Goes Nuclear’ — Trump ‘Will Die in Jail’



Washington, D.C. – The United States is entering an extreme and unprecedented political crisis in the form of a soft coup by the deep state. Politicians on both sides of the aisle have publicly called out these elements of the “intelligence-industrial complex” that are actively working to undermine, discredit and forcibly remove President Trump.


Giving a clear admission of a soft coup in progress, John Schindler, a former professor of national security affairs at the U.S. Naval War College, who spent nearly a decade with the super-secret National Security Agency as an intelligence analyst and counterintelligence officer — and who still maintains deep connections to the intelligence community — readily admitted that senior elements of the intelligence community (IC) are engaging in treason against Trump.


Screen cap, in case it gets deleted.

Speaking to this soft coup and smashing the left/right paradigm, on Tuesday, former Cleveland Democratic congressman Dennis Kucinich boldly stated that, “There’s something wrong going on here in the intelligence community,” in calling out the real reason behind the forced resignation of National Security Advisor Michael Flynn.

Kucinich urged Trump to take control, and locate where the leakers are so he and the American people will know the truth. Kucinich said members of the intelligence community want to reignite a Cold War between the United States and Russia so the military, industrial and intelligence “axis” can “cash in.”

While on the opposite side of the aisle, California Congressman Devin Nunes (R), chairman of the House Committee on Intelligence, proclaimed that the nine intelligence officials who leaked the contents of Flynn’s phone call should be locked up for leaking classified intelligence.

“That’s nine leakers that all belong in jail,” he said. “Those nine people broke the law, clearly, by leaking classified information to anybody.”

This all comes in the wake of the nation’s top security official, National Security Advisor Flynn, being forced to resign after leaks from the IC revealed that he gave “incomplete information” to Vice President Mike Pence and others about the conversations he had with the Russian ambassador prior to Trump taking office.

Flynn has since publicly stated that he “crossed no lines” during an interview with The Daily Caller. Obviously, an experienced intelligence official like Flynn was completely aware of the signals intelligence on Russian diplomats, thus making it extremely unlikely that he would say anything that could be construed as violating the law.

Just remember, it’s not what Flynn said, it’s who he talked to – the Russians – as it is standard operating procedure for incoming officials to talk to diplomats from other countries. The neoliberal and neocon forces are determined to push a new Cold War with Russia, and will not allow for Trump’s intended rapprochement.

When intelligence officials are using their position to leak details to the press in an effort to control the public narrative in hopes of delegitimizing a sitting president, make no mistake that the politicians are no longer in control of the United States – the intelligence apparatus is in control.

Think about the implications of what is taking place; any person running for public office can essentially be manipulated by the intelligence that the NSA has collected on them. The information can then be anonymously leaked to destroy anyone the intel apparatus chooses, thus giving them total control.

The depth of this political crisis cannot be overstated, as the deep state war on Trump could spiral out of control with grave consequences, including the risk of an actual Civil War.

As noted by respected geopolitical analyst The Saker:

At the risk of sounding over the top, I will say that what is happening now is putting the very existence of the United States in danger almost regardless of what Trump will personally do. Whatever we may think of Trump as a person and about his potential as a President, what is certain is that millions of American patriots have voted for him to “clear the swamp”, give the boot to the Washington-based plutocracy and restore what they see as fundamental American values. 
If the Neocons now manage to stage a coup d’etat against Trump, I predict that these millions of American will turn to violence to protect what they see as their way of life, their values and their country. In spite of the image which Hollywood likes to give of them, most Americans are peaceful and non-violent people, but if they are pushed too far they will not hesitate and grab their guns to defend themselves, especially if they lose all hopes in their democracy. And I am not talking only about gun-toting hillbillies here, I am talking about the local, state and county authorities, who often care much more about what their local constituents think and say than what they are up to in DC. If a coup is staged against Trump and some wannabe President à la Hillary or McCain gives the order to the National Guard or even the US Army to put down a local insurrection, we could see what we saw in Russia in 1991: a categorical refusal of the security services to shoot at their own people.
This is a very prescient warning given the volatile political atmosphere in the United States. It should be noted that the confluence of deep state forces in this soft coup against Trump includes Clinton political operatives of the Brock/Podesta/Soros ilk, neocons represented by McCain/Graham, and intelligence operatives in the security apparatus.

Essentially, the losers of the election refuse to submit and have determined that they will wage total war on Trump in an effort to force regime change – elections be damned.

In fact, the dynamics at play are much larger in scope and volume than what most people understand, as they are part of a full spectrum war, utilizing tactics from various global Color Revolutions, to force regime change in the United States. The neocons and neoliberals have virtual control of the Congress, the media, courts, and parts of the intelligence apparatus.

From the time of Bill Clinton until now, these elements have deeply penetrated the Pentagon, Foggy Bottom, and the three letter agencies. Even the Fed is largely aligned with these globalist forces.

So, how can President Trump survive this soft coup?

Trump has only one chance for his political survival.

He must undertake a ruthless, but legal, anti-corruption campaign against the deep state forces aligned against his presidency ala Putin’s anti-corruption campaign in Russia. Make no mistake that Trump, and those that have declared war upon him, are engaged in a fight to the death.
When Putin came to power he inherited a similar situation in the Kremlin, which was every bit as corrupt and traitor-infested as the White House in which Trump now finds himself.

The manner in which this operation would be conducted would be a methodical FBI crackdown on the forces fomenting the soft coup by investigating the plotters on charges of corruption, abuse of power, conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and all the other types of behavior which have gone on forever in Congress, the intelligence community and the media.

Trump could start by instructing FBI Director James Comey to tenaciously investigate criminal activity of those elements involved in the plot. Essentially, he would deal with the coup plotters in the same manner as Putin handled the oligarchs in Russia or how the U.S. took down Al Capone – tax evasion charges, etc.

With the removal of Flynn, Trump is now surrounded by forces that are largely hostile to his stated goal of peace with Russia. The major difference between what Putin faced and what Trump now faces is that the forces aligned against Putin never saw him coming.

Trump’s only choices for political survival are to strike immediately and strike hard, or to cave to the neolibcon line on Russia. Judging by his tweet regarding Crimea this morning, it seems that Trump may be capitulating to the forces intent on his destruction in an effort to save his presidency from total ruin.
To survive the soft coup attempt, without bending to the neolibcon will, Trump must use the FBI to clean house and deliver a steady stream of indictments for corruption, conspiracy to [fill the blank], abuse of authority, obstruction of justice and dereliction of duty, etc. Since such crimes are widespread in the current circles of power, they are also easy to prove and cracking down on corruption would get Trump a standing ovation from the American people.

This is the only way Trump will survive the ongoing coup attempt by the various deep state operatives, working in concert with Clintonian media proxies, is to undertake a widespread anti-corruption campaign aimed at those attempting to overthrow the current U.S. government.

While one may not support Trump’s politics or agenda, make no mistake that those involved in this soft coup are doing nothing less than engaging in treason against the United States.